Making Annoying Phone Calls or Electronic Communications: California Penal Code 653m PC

Under Penal Code § 653m PC, making annoying, harassing, obscene, or threatening phone calls or electronic communications is a distinct criminal offense.

While often labeled simply as "annoying phone calls," a conviction can result in a permanent criminal record, county jail time, hefty fines, and formal restraining orders.

In California, PC 653m charges frequently arise during domestic disputes, contentious divorces, child custody battles, or after romantic breakups. 

Because modern communications encompass text messages, direct messages (DMs), emails, and social media interactions, law enforcement agencies in Los Angeles and across California actively rely on digital forensics and carrier records to prosecute electronic harassment.

Simply put, California Penal Code § 653m PC makes it illegal to use a telephone or electronic communication device to contact or repeatedly attempt to contact another person with the intent to annoy, harass, or threaten them or their family.

Legal Definition of PC 653m 

Under California Penal Code § 653m(a) PC, "Every person who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes contact by means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or concerning such other person any obscene language or any threat to inflict injury to the person or property of the person addressed or any member of his or her family, is guilty of a misdemeanor." Additionally, under PC 653m(b), making repeated telephone calls or electronic communications with the intent to annoy another person at their residence or place of work is likewise a misdemeanor offense.

What Must Be Proven to Convict Under PC 653m

To convict a defendant of making annoying or harassing communications under Penal Code § 653m, the prosecution must establish the following legal elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. Use of Communication Device: The defendant made contact or attempted to make contact using a telephone, cell phone, smartphone, computer, tablet, or other electronic communication device (including text messages, emails, instant messages, fax, or social media applications).

2. Prohibited Conduct: The defendant either:

   • Used obscene, lewd, or offensive language;

   • Made a threat to cause injury to the recipient, the recipient's property, or a member of their family; OR

   • Made repeated communications to the recipient's place of residence, mobile device, or place of employment.

3. Specific Intent to Annoy or Harass: The defendant acted with the specific intent to annoy, harass, or disturb the peace of the recipient or their family at the time the communications were made.

Penalties for Penal Code 653m PC

Making annoying phone calls or electronic communications is classified as a misdemeanor under California law.

• Maximum Custody Sentence: Up to six months (180 days) in county jail.

• Fines: A monetary fine of up to $1,000 plus state-mandated court assessments and fees.

• Summary Probation: Up to 1 to 3 years of misdemeanor (informal) probation in lieu of jail time.

• Protective Orders / Restraining Orders: The court will frequently issue a criminal protective order requiring zero contact with the victim.

• Mandatory Counseling: Judges often require completion of anger management classes, domestic violence counseling, or psychiatric evaluations as a condition of probation.

Defense Strategies Against PC 653m Charges

A skilled criminal defense lawyer can employ multiple defense strategies to challenge allegations under Penal Code § 653m:

• Lack of Intent to Annoy: The primary element of PC 653m is specific intent. If the communications were made for a legitimate business purpose, to settle a lawful debt, or to coordinate necessary co-parenting logistics, there was no criminal intent to annoy or harass.

• Language Was Not Legally Obscene or Threatening: The First Amendment protects crude, rude, or unpleasant speech. Merely using profanity or expressing anger during a heated debate does not meet the legal standard of "obscene" or "threatening" under California law.

• False Accusations and Fabricated Evidence: Harassment charges frequently arise out of bitter custody battles, divorces, or romantic breakups where one party fabricates or exaggerates claims to gain leverage in family court.

• Mistaken Identity / Spoofed Numbers: Digital communications can be sent using anonymous messaging applications, burner numbers, or call-spoofing software. The state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was the specific individual who sent the messages.

Related Laws and Associated Charges

When investigating harassment or electronic communication crimes, prosecutors often file secondary charges stemming from the same course of conduct:

• California Penal Code § 422 PC (Criminal Threats): Prohibits threatening someone with great bodily injury or death, causing the victim to be in sustained, reasonable fear for their safety.

• California Penal Code § 646.9 PC (Stalking): Prohibits willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly harassing or following another person while making a credible threat with the intent to place them in reasonable fear.

• California Penal Code § 273.6 PC (Violation of a Restraining Order): Makes it a misdemeanor to intentionally and knowingly violate the terms of a court-issued domestic violence or civil harassment restraining order.

• California Penal Code § 528.5 PC (Electronic Impersonation): Prohibits knowingly impersonating another person through an electronic device or website for the purpose of harming, intimidating, or defrauding them.

Why related charges matter: Prosecutors frequently charge secondary offenses like Penal Code § 422 (which can be filed as a felony carrying up to 3 years in state prison) or PC 646.9 alongside PC 653m to increase leverage during plea negotiations.

Combining these charges drastically increases potential custody exposure and can turn a misdemeanor conflict into a felony record. Early legal intervention is essential to prevent charges from escalating to higher-level felonies.

Hypothetical Examples

• Legitimate Business/Parenting Conflict: An ex-spouse sends four text messages in one hour regarding emergency medical decisions for their child; because the messages served a legitimate parenting purpose, the sender lacked the intent to annoy required for a PC 653m conviction.

• Repeated Harassing Messages: A rejected dating app user sends 40 vulgar text messages and obscene voice notes over two days to an individual who explicitly asked them to stop contact, establishing clear intent to harass under PC 653m.

• Escalation to Criminal Threats (PC 422): A neighbor leaves a voicemail stating, "If you don't turn off your music, I will burn your house down and kill your dog." Because the message includes a credible threat of violence causing reasonable fear, prosecutors can elevate the charge from PC 653m to felony criminal threats under PC 422.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Can I be charged under PC 653m for text messages or social media posts?

Yes. Penal Code § 653m explicitly covers all "electronic communication devices," which includes text messages, emails, direct messages on social media platforms (such as Instagram or Facebook), faxes, and instant messaging apps.

Does a single phone call or text message violate Penal Code 653m?

A single phone call or text message can result in a PC 653m charge if the communication contains obscene language or a threat to inflict injury. However, if the communication lacks obscene or threatening language, the law requires repeated contacts or calls to substantiate a charge.

What qualifies as "obscene language" under PC 653m?

Under California case law, "obscene" language in a PC 653m context is not limited to sexually explicit speech. It includes language that is grossly offensive, profane, or abusive when measured against prevailing community standards and evaluated within the context of the relationship between the parties.

How do prosecutors prove intent to annoy or harass?

Prosecutors establish intent using circumstantial evidence, including the frequency and timing of calls (e.g., calling repeatedly at 3:00 AM), the tone and content of voicemails/text messages, whether the victim asked you to stop contacting them, and the nature of any underlying personal dispute.

Is making annoying phone calls a felony in California?

No. Penal Code § 653m is strictly a misdemeanor offense punishable by up to six months in county jail. However, if the communications involve credible threats of violence or systematic stalking, prosecutors can file separate felony charges under PC 422 (Criminal Threats) or PC 646.9 (Stalking).

Can an annoying phone call charge be dismissed if the victim wants to drop charges?

In California, criminal charges are brought by the State or County District Attorney's Office, not the alleged victim. Even if the victim regrets reporting the incident or requests to drop charges, prosecutors can choose to proceed with the case using phone records, text screenshots, or voicemail recordings.

What is the difference between PC 653m and PC 422 Criminal Threats?

Penal Code 653m focuses on harassing, annoying, repeated, or obscene communications and carries up to 6 months in jail. Penal Code 422 requires a threat of death or great bodily injury that places the victim in sustained, reasonable fear for their safety; PC 422 is a "wobbler" that can be charged as a felony carrying up to 3 years in state prison.

How can a criminal defense attorney help with a PC 653m charge?

A defense attorney can obtain phone and electronic records, establish lack of intent, demonstrate that the language was protected speech, or negotiate with prosecutors during the pretrial phase to get the charges dismissed, reduced to a non-criminal infraction, or resolved through informal diversion.

Consult a Criminal Defense Lawyer

If you or a loved one is facing criminal allegations under California Penal Code § 653m PC, early legal intervention is critical. Avoid making any statements to law enforcement or sending further communications to the complaining party.

The experienced defense firm of Cron, Israels & Stark represents clients throughout Los Angeles County, the San Fernando Valley, and Southern California in all misdemeanor and felony matters.

Schedule your consultation today at (424) 372-3112 or use the contact form.

Related Content

• Recording Someone Without Consent