Coerced Confession Law and Avoiding a Wrongful Conviction
Coerced confessions are those obtained through police tactics that violate a suspect's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and Fourteenth Amendment right to due process. There are different types, such as voluntary false confessions, compliant false confessions, and persuaded false confessions.
Voluntary false confessions occur when a suspect, often due to a psychological disorder or a desire for attention, confesses to a crime they did not commit, even without police coercion. Compliant false confessions are given to end an interrogation or gain a perceived benefit, such as avoiding further questioning or a more lenient sentence.
Understanding the different types of false confessions is not just informative, but also crucial in the fight against wrongful convictions. Persuaded false confessions, for instance, are obtained through police manipulation, where the suspect is led to believe they committed the crime or that they have a memory that they do not. This knowledge empowers individuals to recognize and defend against such tactics, making them feel proactive and vigilant.
Some coercive police tactics include using physical force or threats of violence during interrogation. Police may also use psychological manipulation by employing techniques like false promises, feigning friendship, leading questions, or prolonged interrogation to wear down the suspect's resistance.
Another includes deceptive interrogation that involves lying about evidence, feigning sympathy, or misrepresenting the legal consequences of confessing. Coerced confessions are inadmissible in court and can lead to the dismissal of charges or a reduced sentence if proven to be the result of coercion.
This means that if a confession is obtained through overbearing police conduct, it cannot be used as evidence in court. While false confessions are not always the result of police coercion, understanding the different types and coercive tactics is crucial for defending against wrongful convictions.
Why Suspects Confess
Understanding the coercive tactics used during police interrogations is crucial, including physical and psychological abuse that can elicit confessions. Sometimes, suspects may confess to a crime that they did not commit because:
- They do so as part of a guilty plea and plea bargain,
- They act in response to police lies, or
- They simply wear down and want to end an interrogation.
A plea bargain occurs when a defendant pleads guilty to a lesser offense in exchange for a reduced charge and a more lenient sentence. Simply put, a defendant may confess to enter a plea and gain the benefits of a more relaxed sentence.
Coerced Confessions Quick Facts
- A coerced confession is an involuntary confession that results from overbearing police conduct.
- A coerced confession is involuntary because the confession is not a product of the accused's free choice.
- Police-induced coerced confessions lead to suspects confessing to crimes they did not commit.
- A coerced confession occurs when someone admits to a crime under undue pressure or threats.
- Coerced confessions have been a significant factor in the wrongful convictions of individuals.
- Many people later exonerated by DNA evidence initially confessed to crimes they didn't commit.
- It's generally easy for someone to falsely admit guilt, whether under pressure, confusion, or manipulation.
- State and federal courts typically exclude evidence of involuntary confessions.
- Inadmissibility is related to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and state laws.
- The Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination is a constitutional guarantee against coerced confessions.
- If unchallenged, coerced confessions can lead to misdemeanor or felony charges.
Interrogation Techniques by Police
Notably, although questionable, the police are permitted to use deception, persuasion, and befriending a suspect. Deception and persuasion are permitted, provided that the tactics do not proximately cause a confession. For example, police officers may claim to have DNA evidence that implicates a defendant in a crime, but they may not actually possess this incriminating evidence.
Sometimes, the police unlawfully try to coerce a confession with physical abuse. However, the cruelest form of abuse is psychological, where the authorities try to get a confession by using mental tricks or emotional ploys.
Some examples include threats of harsher penalties if they do not confess, promises of leniency if they do confess, or presenting fabricated evidence. Other times, the pressure is more subtle but equally damaging, such as prolonged interrogations or presenting fabricated evidence.
Regardless of the method, a coerced confession does not reflect the truth. Coerced false confessions generally fall into three categories: voluntary, compliant, and coerced.
Police also engage in psychological abuse when they try to wear an accused down using deprivation of sleep, water, and food, and unrelenting interrogation. Juvenile offenders and people with cognitive or developmental disabilities are particularly susceptible to psychological tricks.
Role of a Criminal Defense Lawyer
In cases involving coerced confessions, California criminal defense attorneys play a pivotal role. They not only prevent false confessions but also ensure that coerced confessions are not admitted into evidence.
This provides a sense of reassurance and confidence in the legal system, making the audience feel reassured and confident.
Under California law, such confessions are deemed inadmissible in court if they are obtained through coercion, as they undermine the integrity of the justice system. Police officers may explicitly threaten harm, promise leniency, or manipulate a suspect's emotions to elicit a confession.
As noted above, regardless of the method, a coerced confession does not reflect the truth. Coerced false confessions generally fall into three categories: voluntary, compliant, and coerced. Understanding these categories provides a deeper knowledge of the issue, helping to prevent wrongful convictions. This knowledge empowers individuals to recognize and defend against such tactics.
Voluntary False Confession
A voluntary false confession occurs when somebody freely admits to a crime with no external pressure from law enforcement. Most of these confessions are the result of some form of mental illness or psychological disorder. People may confess falsely in these situations for a number of reasons, including:
- Some people may come to believe they committed a crime, even if there is no factual basis for this belief.
- High-profile cases tend to bring out individuals who, for personal reasons, seek attention and admit to crimes they didn't commit.
- Some people might feel an unrelated guilt or sense of responsibility and believe confessing will alleviate that burden.
Not all voluntary false confessions are related to mental illness, however. In some cases, for example, a lucid person might falsely confess to a crime to protect someone else.
Compliant False Confession
Compliant false confessions occur when a suspect admits to a crime due to pressure, fear, or exhaustion, rather than a genuine sense of guilt. These confessions are often the result of:
- Aggressive interrogation tactics,
- Prolonged questioning,
- Sleep deprivation, or
- Threats of harsher penalties for non-cooperation.
Suppose you are interrogated for hours on end, with officers insisting that confessing is your only way out. Over time, the stress can overwhelm even the most resilient person. Police may also exploit a suspect's emotions or vulnerabilities.
Sometimes, officers might suggest that confessing will lead to leniency, such as reduced charges or quicker release, even though they lack the authority to guarantee such outcomes. Some people, fearing continued confrontation or hoping to avoid harsher consequences, comply with law enforcement's demands and admit responsibility-even if they had no part in the crime.
Persuaded False Confession
A persuaded false confession occurs when a suspect becomes convinced they might be guilty, even if they initially believed themselves innocent. This often occurs during intensive interrogations, which can undermine their confidence in their memory or perception of events. Police may use techniques such as:
- Presenting false evidence,
- Fabricated eyewitness accounts,
- Invalid test results, or
- Staged pictures.
Over time, this manipulative environment can sow doubt in the suspect's mind, particularly if they cannot recall their whereabouts or actions in detail. For example, imagine a suspect who genuinely believes they were not involved in a crime but cannot provide a full account for a specific period.
Interrogators might suggest alternate narratives, such as that the suspect committed the act unknowingly or blocked out the memory due to trauma. Under these circumstances, the suspect may come to doubt their innocence and accept the police's version of events, leading to a confession they later regret.
What If a Confession is Coerced?
If you're suspected of a crime and worried about the nature or validity of a confession you may have made, you should know that you still have rights and that your confession doesn't automatically mean you will be convicted.
In fact, if your attorney can show that the confession was coerced, it will be inadmissible in court. The United States and California state constitutions, as well as court opinions, all state that coerced confessions are inadmissible at trial. Involuntary confessions are prohibited by the federal constitution's Due Process Clause and similar state statutes.
A coerced confession is inadmissible in the criminal justice system, and it stands true even if the confession is true. In order for a confession to be held admissible at trial, the district attorney must prove that it was voluntarily given, and do so by a preponderance of the evidence.
A court considers all the facts surrounding a confession to determine whether it was voluntary, applying the "totality of the circumstances" test.
Does a Confession Guarantee a Conviction?
While a coerced confession can seem like a guaranteed conviction, it's essential to remember that a false confession does not automatically equate to guilt. California courts are increasingly aware of the tactics used to elicit these admissions, and our criminal defense attorneys know how to challenge the validity of such confessions.
If an involuntary confession was given, we can file a suppression motion seeking to exclude it from evidence. We will examine the circumstances of your interrogation, establish whether coercive tactics were employed, and work to have the confession excluded from evidence.
We can also help prevent a coerced confession. If you are a suspect who is subjected to police questioning, you must exercise your Miranda rights. This means that you can refuse to answer any questions until you have the opportunity to speak to a criminal defense attorney.
Simply put, you have the right to speak with a lawyer before answering any questions asked by police. The exercise of this right can help stop questioning and reduce the risk of giving a false confession. We might also present alternative evidence that reinforces your innocence or highlights inconsistencies in the prosecution's case.
For additional information, contact our criminal defense law firm, Cron, Israels & Stark, located in Los Angeles, CA.
Related Content: