California Penal Code Section 95 PC: Improper Attempt to Influence Juror, Arbitrator, or Referee

Penal Code 95 makes it a felony for anyone to corruptly attempt to influence a juror, referee, arbitrator, or umpire through unauthorized communications, improper arguments, threats, or bribery.

Designed to safeguard the sanctity and independence of judicial fact-finders from outside pressure or manipulation, the statute ensures that verdicts and rulings rest solely on admissible evidence and impartial deliberation.

Understanding California Penal Code Section 95 PC is essential to grasping how the state prosecutes corrupt interference, jury tampering, and unlawful attempts to influence the decisions of jurors, referees, arbitrators, or umpires.

What is the Legal Definition of PC 95?

Every person who corruptly attempts to influence a juror, or any person summoned or drawn as a juror, or chosen as an arbitrator, or referee, or umpire, in respect to his or her verdict, decision, judgment, award, or other cause or proceeding, pending, or about to be brought before him or her, is guilty of a felony.

This statute provides specialized accountability to protect trial participants and arbiters from tampering, establishing severe criminal penalties for anyone who steps outside legal boundaries to sway a judicial outcome.

What Key Statutory Definitions Apply Under Penal Code 95?

Understanding these foundational legal terms is essential because the prosecution must establish every specific statutory element—from qualifying juror status to corrupt intent—to secure a conviction.

Juror or Panelist: Includes active trial jurors, grand jurors, and any individual summoned or drawn to serve on a jury panel.
Arbitrator, Referee, or Umpire: Court-appointed or privately agreed-upon neutrals authorized to hear, evaluate, or decide a legal controversy or dispute.
Corruptly: Acting with a wrongful design, improper motive, or unlawful intent to gain an unfair advantage or subvert the administration of justice.
Attempt to Influence: Any unauthorized communication, pressure, gift, or extra-judicial argument directed at a juror or referee regarding a pending or upcoming case.

What Must Be Proven to Convict Under PC 95?

To secure a conviction under California Penal Code Section 95, the prosecution must establish specific legal elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

Qualifying Recipient: The target of the influence was an active or summoned juror, grand juror, referee, arbitrator, or umpire.
Pending Matter: A cause, proceeding, trial, or dispute was pending or about to be brought before that individual.
Corrupt Intent: The defendant acted with a corrupt motive or unlawful intent to sway or direct the recipient's verdict, award, or decision.

What Are the Penalties and Sentencing for Penal Code 95 Violations?

Violating California Penal Code Section 95 is strictly classified as a felony offense, reflecting the serious threat that jury tampering and improper influence pose to the justice system.

Offense Classification	Maximum Prison Term	Maximum Fines & Probation Options
Felony	2, 3, or 4 years in state prison	Up to $10,000 fine, formal felony probation, or mandatory court-ordered counseling

What Legal Defense Strategies Can Be Used Against PC 95 Charges?

Defending against an accusation under Penal Code 95 requires a meticulous review of communication records, witness testimony, and the context of any alleged contact:

Absence of Corrupt Intent: If communications with a juror or arbitrator were entirely innocent, accidental, or free of any corrupt objective (such as a chance social greeting without case discussion), criminal intent is missing.
No Attempt to Influence Case Outcomes: Proving that the interaction did not touch upon the merits, evidence, or upcoming verdict of the pending proceeding undermines the core statutory requirement.
First Amendment Protections: In certain contexts, general political or public commentary may be protected speech, provided it does not cross into unauthorized communication or corrupt pressure directed at a sitting juror.
False Accusations or Misunderstanding: Misinterpreted statements, biased witnesses, or exaggerated claims by disgruntled trial participants can be challenged through cross-examination and forensic phone or email records.

How Does Penal Code 95 Apply in a Hypothetical Example?

Consider a scenario where a high-profile civil trial is underway, and a close friend of one of the litigants discovers a juror's identity. The friend approaches the juror at a local coffee shop, slips them a note containing arguments favorable to the litigant, and says, "You need to vote in their favor if you know what's good for you."

Because the individual corruptly attempted to influence an active juror regarding a pending court proceeding through unauthorized extra-judicial communication and implied pressure, they can be arrested, charged, and prosecuted under California Penal Code Section 95 PC.

What Related Laws Impact Penal Code 95 Cases?

Understanding adjacent statutory provisions is essential because prosecutors frequently evaluate overlapping criminal statutes to determine the most appropriate charges or to file multiple counts based on the exact nature of the conduct.

California Penal Code Section 96 PC – Misconduct of Jurors, Arbitrators, or Referees: Punishes jurors or referees who accept unauthorized communications or corruptly promise a verdict. This statute serves as the counterpart to PC 95, targeting the recipient who engages in misconduct rather than the outsider attempting to influence the process.
California Penal Code Section 92 PC – Bribery of Judges or Jurors: Criminalizes offering or giving bribes to judges, jurors, or referees. Prosecutors often file PC 92 alongside PC 95 when an improper attempt to influence involves monetary payoffs or financial incentives.
California Penal Code Section 136.1 PC – Witness Intimidation: Prohibits preventing or dissuading a witness or victim from attending trial or testifying. Investigators often review witness-tampering statutes alongside PC 95 when corruption targets multiple trial participants.
California Penal Code Section 166 PC – Criminal Contempt: Penalizes willful disobedience of court orders, including contacting jurors in violation of direct judicial instructions. Prosecutors often bring contempt charges concurrently with jury tampering allegations.
California Penal Code Section 137 PC – Influencing Testimony: Criminalizes offering bribes or using threats to influence prospective witnesses. Prosecutors evaluate this related statute when improper influence extends beyond jurors to those providing evidence on the stand.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Does an outsider have to offer money or a bribe to violate Penal Code 95?

No. While bribery violates the statute, PC 95 is much broader. Any corrupt attempt to influence a juror or referee—whether through pleading letters, implied threats, improper arguments, or emotional appeals outside the courtroom—constitutes a felony.

Can someone be convicted under PC 95 if the juror never actually read or heard the communication?

Yes. The crime focuses on the attempt to corruptly influence. If a defendant sends an improper message or approaches a juror with corrupt intent, the offense is complete regardless of whether the juror ignored the communication or was successfully swayed.

Does Penal Code 95 apply to grand jurors as well as trial jurors?

Yes. The statute explicitly encompasses active trial jurors, individuals summoned or drawn as prospective jurors, grand jurors, and court-appointed referees, arbitrators, or umpires.

What happens if a juror initiates contact with an outside party?

If an outside party receives unauthorized contact from a juror and immediately reports it to the court without engaging in corrupt discussions or reciprocating influence, they have not violated Penal Code 95. However, responding or encouraging the exchange can trigger criminal exposure.

What should I do if I am accused of jury tampering or improper contact?

Immediately exercise your right to remain silent and retain an experienced California criminal defense attorney. Early legal counsel is vital to examine evidence, protect your rights, and navigate complex court investigations.

How Cron, Israels & Stark Can Help You

Facing accusations or an investigation under California Penal Code Section 95 PC for alleged jury tampering or improper influence is a serious crisis that threatens your freedom and future.

Charges of corrupting court proceedings carry harsh state prison sentences, heavy fines, and severe long-term consequences. You need an aggressive, knowledgeable legal defense team ready to protect your rights from day one.

Thorough Investigation of Contact Context: We carefully review phone records, text messages, surveillance footage, and witness accounts to demonstrate that any communication was innocent, entirely unrelated to the case merits, or free of corrupt intent.
Challenging the Prosecution's Elements: The state must prove a specific corrupt motive and a direct attempt to influence an active or summoned juror. We vigorously dispute whether the state has met these statutory elements beyond a reasonable doubt.
Protecting First Amendment and Due Process Rights: We evaluate whether communications constituted lawful public speech or if law enforcement engaged in overbearing entrapment or unlawful interrogation tactics.
Proactive Pre-File Defense: If you are under suspicion but have not yet been formally charged, our attorneys can intervene early with investigators to present exculpatory evidence and work to prevent felony charges from ever being filed.

If you or someone you know is facing allegations under California Penal Code Section 95, do not wait. Contact our office today for a confidential consultation to protect your liberty, your rights, and your record.

The California criminal defense attorneys at Cron, Israels & Stark are here to help you.

Attempt to Influence