Contact Us Today (424) 372-3112

Blog

What Does "Dismissed in the Interest of Justice" Mean?

Posted by Sam Israels | Nov 15, 2025

In California, judges hold a unique and significant authority under Penal Code 1385 PC. They have the power to dismiss specific charges or enhancements if they find them to be unfair, unnecessary, or frivolous, essentially in the interest of justice.

Dismissed in the Interest of Justice
PC 1385 permits judges to dismiss a defendant's charges or enhancements if it serves the interests of justice.

According to PC 1385, only the judge has the authority to dismiss the case. A motion for dismissal based on justice can only be filed by prosecutors, not by defense attorneys.

The defense can only request that the court consider dismissal under PC 1385, but cannot submit a formal motion explaining why it should be granted.

The phrase "in the interest of justice" is frequently interpreted in different ways. According to Penal Code 1385, dismissing a case promotes fairness and integrity within the legal process, reassuring all parties of the system's commitment to justice.

This provision can be employed to prevent prosecution or punishment when such measures are unfair or unnecessary. Additionally, it grants the judiciary discretion and protects against unjust or frivolous charges.

California Penal Code 1385 allows courts to dismiss a criminal charge to serve justice, but the motion must be filed before the plea is entered.

Additionally, courts are required to dismiss sentencing enhancements if doing so would serve the interests of justice. Motions to dismiss a penalty enhancement may be filed after sentencing. Valid reasons for such a motion include the defendant being a juvenile or having a mental illness.

Under California Penal Code Section 991, defendants may request a pretrial hearing to dismiss misdemeanor charges when the evidence is insufficient.

What is the content of PC 1385?

Penal Code 1385 PC says, "(a) The judge or magistrate may, either on motion of the court or upon the application of the prosecuting attorney, and in furtherance of justice, order an action to be dismissed.

The reasons for the dismissal shall be stated orally on the record. The court shall also set forth the reasons in an order entered upon the minutes if requested by either party or in any case in which the proceedings are not being recorded electronically or reported by a court reporter. A dismissal shall not be made for any cause that would be a ground of demurrer to the accusatory pleading."

(b) (1) If the court has the authority, pursuant to subdivision (a), to strike or dismiss an enhancement, the court may instead strike the additional punishment for that enhancement in the furtherance of justice in compliance with subdivision (a)…."

What is the way the law functions?

PC 1385 covers two circumstances where the judge can dismiss cases in the interest of justice; these scenarios involve different procedures: one for dismissing criminal charges and another for dismissing criminal enhancements.

The judge may dismiss the criminal charges entirely, either at their discretion or upon the prosecutor's motion, if they believe it serves justice better.

A motion for dismissal in the interest of justice must be submitted before the defendant enters a plea. When dismissing, the judge is required to verbally state the reasons on the record and give a written copy to prosecutors or the defense if requested.

Judges have wide discretion under PC 1385 when dismissing charges, considering factors such as:

  • Your age;
  • Your health;
  • Your previous criminal record;
  • The seriousness of the offense;
  • Your chances of reoffending;

Understanding the Dismissal of Criminal Enhancements

In criminal cases, enhancements involve adding extra punishments to a sentence for specific crimes. They usually come into play when there are aggravating factors or the offense was especially violent.

The judge may also dismiss these enhancements in the interest of justice either on their own initiative or upon motion by the prosecuting attorney. Dismissing an enhancement does not mean the original charges are dropped-only the extra penalties are affected.

Under PC 1385, a motion to dismiss criminal enhancements in the interest of justice can be filed at any time, including after sentencing.

As of January 2022, unlike the wide discretion judges have in dismissing criminal charges, they are required to dismiss criminal enhancements if one or more of the listed mitigating circumstances are present.

  • Implementing criminal enhancement could lead to unfair racial discrimination.
  • This improvement might cause your sentence to go beyond 20 years.
  • Mental illness contributed to the underlying crime.
  • Childhood trauma or previous victimization, such as abuse or human trafficking, contributed to the underlying crime.
  • The core offense is not classified as a violent felony.
  • You were under 18 years old at the time of committing the offense.
  • Your conviction for the alleged crime predates five years.
  • You used a firearm that was either unloaded or inoperable when committing the crime.
  • The base crime qualifies for multiple enhancements, but if that's the case, all additional enhancements are dropped, leaving only one.

What is the function of a defense attorney?

While the judge alone has the authority to execute a motion under PC 1385, a California criminal defense attorney can still play a crucial role. Although they cannot officially file a motion, they can 'invite' the court to exercise its authority by presenting compelling reasons why dismissing the case would serve justice.

This is typically done by presenting compelling reasons why dismissing the case would serve justice. The defense lawyer's role is to advocate for the defendant, and referencing PC 1385 offers a useful tool to help attain a more favorable result.

Prosecutors can file a motion to dismiss under PC 1385 from the other side of the courtroom. For instance, they might request the judge to dismiss specific charges or enhancements as part of a plea deal or a pretrial diversion program.

However, it is important to note that the judge is not required to grant a PC 1385 motion, even if both parties agree. The judge must independently evaluate whether the dismissal serves the cause of justice, ensuring a fair and impartial decision.

Contact our law firm to schedule a case review by phone or through our contact form. Cron, Israels & Stark has offices in Los Angeles, CA.

Related Content

About the Author

Sam Israels
Sam Israels

Sam J. Israels is a Law Firm partner with the Law Offices of Cron, Israels, & Stark. Mr. Israels received his J.D. degree from the Santa Clara University School of Law. Mr. Israels also previously worked at the Los Angeles Office of the City Attorney. He is admitted to practice law in the State o...

Contact Us Today

Cron, Israels & Stark is committed to answering your questions about All Misdemeanor and Felony Crime law issues in Santa Monica and Los Angeles, California.

We offer a free consultation and we'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.

Menu